Here's a quote from a website. http://www.kithrup.com/brin/neotenyarticle2.html

In "runaway" sexual selection, the selected trait becomes more embedded and exaggerated with each passing generation, requiring the next wave of the selected sex (usually males) to compete from a new plateau, which amplifies the trait even more, and so on. Even if the degree of exaggeration threatens the viability of the species at large -- e.g., the titanic antlers of the extinct Irish elk -- this may not abate the driving competition among individuals for reproductive success. The models of R. A. Fisher (1958) long ago showed that evolution of a sexually selected trait, and the preference for it, can strongly correlate, with both accelerating in tandem. Why is it nearly universally males of species who become burdened with huge antlers, giant tail feathers, or other garish exaggerations? A mistake of teleology might claim this is only fair, since females carry the major costs of reproduction, and a larger share of the risk. A more valid explanation lies in the fact that females in these species have a dictatorial veto over which males get to breed. Males wind up being selected to satisfy any criteria females get in the habit of using. -- From "Neoteny and Two-Way Sexual Selection in Human Evolution", described by the author as "A Paleo-Anthropological Speculation on the Origins of Secondary-Sexual Traits, Male Nurturing and the Child as a Sexual Image", by David Brin, Ph.D.

 

Heres a summary of what you can learn from that:

1. Females are evil and too cold and selfish to care about males, who are mostly just the same as them. In fact, they wouldn't care about other females also, because they are so selfish. It just happens males make a more convenient victim.
2. The females are so disgusting, that they decide to vandalise a sacred gift (reproduction) that doesn't belong to them, by making choices that they think benefits them personally, even if it doesn't benefit the males.
3. This makes the entire SPECIES suffer, but the females don't care, they keep on selecting males like that.
4. The species went extinct (Irish elks with their too big antlers on males that the females demanded)

Pretty horrible, right? Yep. Thats how fucked up females are.

What have human females done to human males that isn't fair? Mostly being turned into a caveman while females get to stay more childlike. Stuff like having horrid hair growing (actually Oriental and native American males have less or none of this, so we can assume that Oriental girls are nicer), and having our skulls change into being cavemanly instead of boylike. Females did this to us because they only want males as a providor/protector. Females only have a romantic relationship with themself, because they are evil fucked up sick and self-obsessed.

If you notice things about humans in general, you'll see that there are many males willing to sell out their own, just to please the evil females. (Judges, politicians and other law makers, police, etc) This is because evil females are in control. Those males think that they can't get any pussy if they don't act like slaves to females.

Unfortunately, selling out your own gender has a side effect of being bad for your health, something self preserving males who don't sell out their own get to keep, at least to a greater extent.

Females have always done this to us males. However, it's never been necessary. In fact, its never been the best way to do things. Here is the current situation, and the best alternative:

• Current - Females get far more choice over which males they get. Females also as a group, choose males who take a much harder life than the females do. They choose males who work to provide for the females. Who protect the females, while the females won't protect the males. They choose primitive males, instead of more evolved and intelligent males, because they think primitive males make better protectors.
• Perfect - Males and females choose each other. Males and females, only want to choose other males and females, who are more evolved, advanced , strong and healthy. They reject males and females, who are too primitive or stupid, who refuse to evolve. Males don't choose females who take a harder life for the benefit of males, and females don't choose males who take a harder life to benefit females. We would evolve at lightspeed compared to the current situation. We would have no more suffering, lack of love, and wars. Males wouldn't end up commiting suicide 4x more, homeless 7x more, or living shorter life spans. We would have equality, because we would consciously distribute the burdens equally (even if the burdens were different, they would be different but equal, and measured by lifespans). Males wouldn't be forced into being hairy and having caveman skulls. They would be refined, smooth and elegant as if they were children, yet tall and strong as an adult. Stronger in fact, because of the advanced evolutionary rate.

The more cavemanly guys (that the females choose), are causing havoc in this world. The evil females don't want nice guys. If evil females weren't like that, we wouldn't have so much war, social disease, and violence. If we ever go extinct, more advanced species out there in space will know that its the fault of the women here.

In other words:

It's all your fault!

I hope that article snippet above helps convince you of that. Now, evil female, go live in shame and disgrace for your disgusting inner ugly evil nature.